Advertisement

Is a symmetrical face really attractive?

  • N.A. Harun
    Correspondence
    Correspondence to: Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Diagnosis, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, IIUM Kuantan Campus, Sultan Ahmad Shah Street, Bandar Indera Mahkota, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. Fax: +60 95705580.
    Affiliations
    Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Diagnosis, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, IIUM Kuantan Campus, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
    Search for articles by this author
  • K.B.C. Adam
    Affiliations
    Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Diagnosis, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, IIUM Kuantan Campus, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
    Search for articles by this author
  • N.A. Abdullah
    Affiliations
    Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Diagnosis, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, IIUM Kuantan Campus, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
    Search for articles by this author
  • N. Rusli
    Affiliations
    Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Diagnosis, Kulliyyah of Dentistry, IIUM Kuantan Campus, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 08, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.09.031

      Abstract

      Facial symmetry plays an important role in facial attractiveness and is one of the major criteria used to determine attractiveness in humans. In craniomaxillofacial surgery, facial symmetry is one of the main considerations. The aim of this study was to determine anthropometric measurements quantitatively and investigate the relationship between facial symmetry and attractiveness in a local Malay population. The study included 30 photographed Malay individuals and 100 photograph assessors, all aged between 18 and 26 years. The assessors indicated their preferences regarding the more attractive face on original and manipulated (symmetrical face) photographs. None of the photographed subjects had a perfectly symmetrical face (asymmetry index (AI) of 0%); 33.3% of the photographed subjects had an AI in the range of 1.6–2.0%. The majority of assessors chose the manipulated symmetrical face as the most attractive (manipulated photograph selected in 91.2% of cases). As facial symmetry is considered a critical factor in attractiveness, it is beneficial to consider balance and symmetry prior to facial reconstruction. The AI values found in this study may be useful as guidance to determine the normal minimum balance of facial symmetry. No AI values indicating perfect symmetry were observed for the unedited facial anthropometric measurements. However, the projection of a perfectly symmetrical face does influence the perception of facial attractiveness.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thornhill R.
        • Gangestad S.W.
        Facial attractiveness.
        Trends Cogn Sci. 1999; 3: 452-460https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5
        • Campbell R.
        The lateralisation of emotion: a critical review.
        Int J Psychol. 1982; 17: 211-229https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598208247442
        • Farkas L.G.
        • Cheung G.
        Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians: an anthropometrical study.
        Angle Orthod. 1981; 51: 70-77
        • Richardson C.K.
        • Bowers D.
        • Bauer R.M.
        • Heilman K.M.
        • Leonard C.M.
        Digitizing the moving face during dynamic displays of emotion.
        Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38: 1028-1039https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00151-7
        • Baudouin J.Y.
        • Tiberghien G.
        Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women.
        Acta Psychol. 2004; 117: 313-332https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002
        • Springer I.N.
        • Wannicke B.
        • Warnke P.H.
        • Zernial O.
        • Wiltfang J.
        • Russo P.A.
        • Terheyden H.
        • Reinhardt A.
        • Wolfart S.
        Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59: 156-162https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000252041.66540.ec
        • Rhodes G.
        • Proffitt F.
        • Grady J.M.
        • Sumich A.
        Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty.
        Psychon Bull Rev. 1998; 5: 659-669https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208842
        • Enquist M.
        • Arak A.
        Symmetry, beauty and evolution.
        Nature. 1994; 372: 169-172https://doi.org/10.1038/372169a0
        • Kowner R.
        Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgement in developmental perspective.
        J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996; 22: 662-675https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.3.662
        • Berlin N.F.
        • Berssenbrügge P.
        • Runte C.
        • Wermker K.
        • Jung S.
        • Kleinheinz J.
        • Dirksen D.
        Quantification of facial asymmetry by 2D analysis—a comparison of recent approaches.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 42: 265-271https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.07.033
        • Le T.T.
        • Farkas L.G.
        • Ngim R.C.K.
        • Levin L.S.
        • Forrest C.R.
        Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002; 26: 64-69https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-001-0033-7
        • Farkas L.G.
        Anthropometry of the Head and Face. Second edition. Raven Press, New York1994
        • Severt T.R.
        • Proffit W.R.
        The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina.
        Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997; 12: 171-176
        • Hönn M.
        • Göz G.
        The ideal of facial beauty: a review.
        J Orofac Orthop. 2007; 68: 6-16https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-007-0604-6
        • Farkas L.G.
        • Katic M.J.
        • Forrest C.R.
        • Alt K.W.
        • Bagic I.
        • Baltadjiev G.
        • Cunha E.
        • Cvicelová M.
        • Davies S.
        • Erasmus I.
        • Gillett-Netting R.
        • Hajnis K.
        • Kemkes-Grottenthaler A.
        • Khomyakova I.
        • Kumi A.
        • Kgamphe J.S.
        • Kayo-daigo N.
        • Le T.
        • Malinowski A.
        • Negasheva M.
        • Manolis S.
        • Ogetürk M.
        • Parvizrad R.
        • Rösing F.
        • Sahu P.
        • Sforza C.
        • Sivkov S.
        • Sultanova N.
        • Tomazo-Ravnik T.
        • Tóth G.
        • Uzun A.
        • Yahia E.
        International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2005; 16: 615-646https://doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9e
        • Ozdemir S.T.
        The concept of anthropometric facial asymmetry.
        in: Preedy V.R. Handbook of Anthropometry. Springer, New York2012: 625-639https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1788-1
        • Haraguchi S.
        • Iguchi Y.
        • Takada K.
        Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients.
        Angle Orthod. 2008; 78: 421-426https://doi.org/10.2319/022107-85.1
        • Naini F.B.
        • Gill D.S.
        Facial aesthetics: 2. Clinical assessment.
        Dent Update. 2008; 35: 159-170https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2008.35.3.159
        • Nakamura T.
        • Okamoto K.
        • Maruyama T.
        Facial asymmetry in patients with cervicobrachial pain and headache.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28 (doi: 10. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00766.x): 1009-1014
        • Strauss R.A.
        • Weis B.D.
        • Lindauer S.J.
        • Rebellato J.
        • Isaacson R.J.
        Variability of facial photographs for use in treatment planning for orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
        Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997; 12: 197-203
        • Ferrario V.F.
        • Sforza C.
        • Poggio C.E.
        • Tartaglia G.
        Distance from symmetry: a three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 52: 1126-1132https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90528-2
        • Peck S.
        • Peck L.
        • Kataja M.
        Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces.
        Angle Orthod. 1991; 61: 43-48https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0043:SAIEPF>2.0.CO;2
        • Bishara S.E.
        • Burkey P.S.
        • Kharouf J.G.
        Dental and facial asymmetries: a review.
        Angle Orthod. 1994; 64: 89-98
        • Vu Pham T.A.
        • Nguyen P.A.
        Morphological features of smile attractiveness and related factors influence perception and gingival aesthetic parameters.
        Int Dent J. 2022; 72: 67-75
        • Mathis A.
        • Laskin D.M.
        • Tufekci E.
        • Caricco C.
        • Lindauer S.J.
        Upper lip asymmetry during smiling: an analysis using three-dimensional images.
        Turk J Orthod. 2018; 31: 32-36https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17056
        • Ngeow W.C.
        • Aljunid S.T.
        Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays.
        Singap Med J. 2009; 50: 525-528
        • Ngeow W.
        • Aljunid S.
        Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malaysian Indians.
        Indian J Dent Res. 2009; 20: 313-319https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.57372
        • Lum V.
        • Goonewardene M.S.
        • Mian A.
        • Eastwood P.
        Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry using dense correspondence, symmetry, and midline analysis.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 158: 134-146https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.014
        • Huang C.S.
        • Liu X.Q.
        • Chen Y.R.
        Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults.
        Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013; 16: 97-104https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12010
        • Noor F.
        • Evans D.C.
        The effect of facial symmetry on perceptions of personality and attractiveness.
        J Res Pers. 2003; 37: 339-347https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00022-9
        • Zaidel D.W.
        • Deblieck C.
        Attractiveness of natural faces compared to computer constructed perfectly symmetrical faces.
        Int J Neurosci. 2007; 117: 423-431https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450600581928
        • Benson K.J.
        • Laskin D.M.
        Upper lip asymmetry in adults during smiling.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59: 396-398https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.21874
        • OʼHara M.W.
        • Ghoneim M.M.
        • Hinrichs J.V.
        • Mehta M.P.
        • Wright E.J.
        Psychological consequences of surgery.
        Psychosom Med. 1989; 51: 356-370https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-198905000-00010
        • Rohrich R.J.
        • Villanueva N.L.
        • Small K.H.
        • Pezeshk R.A.
        Implications of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 510-516https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003606
        • Carvalho B.
        • Ballin A.C.
        • Becker R.V.
        • Berger C.A.
        • Hurtado J.G.
        • Mocellin M.
        Rhinoplasty and facial asymmetry: analysis of subjective and anthropometric factors in the Caucasian nose.
        Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 16: 445-451https://doi.org/10.7162/S1809-97772012000400004
        • da Pozzo F.
        • Rusconi F.M.E.
        • Beltramini G.A.
        • Gibelli D.M.
        • Pucciarelli V.
        • Giannì A.B.
        • Sforza C.
        Soft-tissue facial asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery: application of a new 3D protocol.
        Stomatol Edu J. 2018; 5: 98-101https://doi.org/10.25241/stomaeduj.2018.5(2).art.3