Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the best timing to perform arthrocentesis in the
management of temporomandibular disorders with regard to conservative treatment. A
systematic search based on PRISMA guidelines, including a computer search with specific
keywords, reference list search, and manual search was performed. Relevant articles
were selected after three search rounds for final review based on six predefined inclusion
criteria, followed by a round of critical appraisal. Eleven publications, including
eight randomized controlled trials and three prospective clinical studies, were included
in the review. The studies were divided into three groups based on the timing of arthrocentesis:
(1) arthrocentesis as the initial treatment; (2) early arthrocentesis; and (3) late
arthrocentesis. Meta-analysis was carried out to compare the efficacy of improvement
in mouth opening and pain reduction in the three groups. All three groups showed improvement
in mouth opening and pain reduction, with forest plots suggesting that arthrocentesis
performed within 3 months of conservative treatment might produce beneficial results.
We conclude that there is a knowledge gap in the current literature regarding the
preferable timing to perform arthrocentesis in the management of temporomandibular
disorders, and more high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to shed
light on this subject.
Key words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
Facial Pain. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.
- A longitudinal epidemiologic study of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders from 15 to 35 years of age.J Orofac Pain. 2000; 14: 310-319
- Therapeutic jaw exercises and interocclusal appliance therapy. A comparison between two common treatments of temporomandibular disorders.Swed Dent J. 1999; 23: 27-37
- Current thinking about the management of dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint: a review.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 55: 351-356
- Short-term effectiveness of conservative therapies in pain, quality of life, and sleep in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized clinical trial.Cranio. 2019; : 1-9
- Introduction.in: Giamberardino M.A. T J. Pain Comorbidities: Understanding and Treating the Complex Patient. IASP Press, Seattle2012: 1-20
- Psychological Approaches to Pain Management: A Practitioner’s Hand Book.The Gilford Press, New York, NY2002
- Determining predictor variables for treatment outcomes of arthrocentesis and hydraulic distention of the temporomandibular joint.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62: 816-823
- Depression, pain, exposure to stressful life events, and long-term outcomes in temporomandibular disorder patients.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59: 628-633
- Identification of psychological comorbidity in TMD-patients.Cranio. 2016; 34: 182-187
- Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991; 49: 1163-1170
- Does the use of soft or hard splints affect the short-term outcome of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis?.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 37: 424-427
- Relationship between effectiveness of arthrocentesis under sufficient pressure and conditions of the temporomandibular joint.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 225-228
- Long-term outcome of arthrocentesis for sudden-onset, persistent, severe closed lock of the temporomandibular joint.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 55: 151-158
- Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis. Review of the literature.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012; 17: e575-81
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.BMJ. 2009; 339: b2700
- Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.JAMA. 2000; 283: 2008-2012
- Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5: 13
- 9.5. 2 Identifying and measuring heterogeneity. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 502).Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK2009
- Higgins J.P.T. Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011
- Comparison of treatment efficacy between hyaluronic acid and arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid in internal derangements of temporomandibular joint.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019; 47: 1720-1727
- A comparison of the effects of Methylprednisolone Acetate, Sodium Hyaluronate and Tenoxicam in the treatment of non-reducing disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018; 23: e351-8
- Arthrocentesis as initial treatment for temporomandibular joint arthropathy: a randomized controlled trial.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 42: e134-9
- Is there a role for arthrocentesis in recapturing the displaced disc in patients with closed lock of the temporomandibular joint?.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105: 274-280
- Comparison of the effectiveness of three different treatment methods for temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 46: 603-609
- Arthrocentesis for the treatment of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010; 9: 350-354
- Management of patients with disk displacement without reduction of the temporomandibular joint by arthrocentesis alone, plus hyaluronic acid or plus platelet-rich plasma.Dent Med Probl. 2019; 56: 265-272
- Comparison of single- and double-puncture arthrocentesis for the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders: A six-month, prospective study.Cranio. 2019; : 1-6
- Age, gender and parafunctional habits as prognostic factors for temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis.Cranio. 2018; 36: 121-127
- Prospective short term comparison of outcomes after single or double puncture arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 54: 26-29
- Effect of intra-articular administration of buprenorphine after arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: a pilot study.Quintessence Int. 2007; 38: e484-9
- Temporomandibular disorders: a clinical update.BMJ. 1998; 317: 190-194
- Current practice in the management of temporomandibular disorders.Dent Update. 2008; 35: 314-316
- Temporomandibular dysfunction.Aust J Gen Pract. 2018; 47: 212-215
- A comparison of the outcomes of four minimally invasive treatment methods for anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 46: 1403-1410
- Evaluation of TMJ surgery in cases not responding to conservative treatment.Cranio. 1995; 13: 44-49
- The role of surgery in the management of disorders of the Temporomandibular Joint: a critical review of the literature. Part 1.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34: 107-113
- Is there a role for temporomandibular joint surgery?.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 32: 307-313
- Meta-analysis of surgical treatments for temporomandibular articular disorders.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61: 3-10
- The hierarchy of different treatments for arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; 48: 9-23
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 15, 2021
Accepted:
January 20,
2021
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.