Advertisement
Clinical Paper Oral Medicine| Volume 45, ISSUE 2, P245-254, February 2016

Technical and surgical aspects of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) microstimulator insertion procedure

Published:November 07, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.023

      Abstract

      Cluster headache (CH) is a debilitating, severe form of headache. A novel non-systemic therapy has been developed that produces therapeutic electrical stimulation to the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG). A transoral surgical technique for inserting the Pulsante SPG Microstimulator into the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) is presented herein. Technical aspects include detailed descriptions of the preoperative planning using computed tomography or cone beam computed tomography scans for presurgical digital microstimulator insertion into the patient-specific anatomy and intraoperative verification of microstimulator placement. Surgical aspects include techniques to insert the microstimulator into the proper midface location atraumatically. During the Pathway CH-1 and Pathway R-1 studies, 99 CH patients received an SPG microstimulator. Ninety-six had a microstimulator placed within the PPF during their initial procedure. Perioperative surgical sequelae included sensory disturbances, pain, and swelling. Follow-up procedures included placement of a second microstimulator on the opposite side (n = 2), adjustment of the microstimulator lead location (n = 13), re-placement after initial unsuccessful placement (n = 1), and removal (n = 5). This SPG microstimulator insertion procedure has sequelae comparable to other oral cavity procedures including tooth extractions, sinus surgery, and dental implant placement. Twenty-five of 29 subjects (86%) completing a self-assessment questionnaire indicated that the surgical effects were tolerable and 90% would make the same decision again.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society
        The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition.
        Cephalalgia. 2004; 24: 9-160
        • Fischera M.
        • Marziniak M.
        • Gralow I.
        • Evers S.
        The incidence and prevalence of cluster headache: a meta-analysis of population-based studies.
        Cephalalgia. 2008; 28: 614-618
        • Lang J.
        Clinical anatomy of the masticatory apparatus and peripharyngeal spaces.
        Thieme Medical Publishers, New York1995: 122-132
        • Norton N.S.
        Netter's head and neck anatomy for dentistry.
        Saunders, Philadelphia2006: 268-282
        • Ruskell G.L.
        Orbital passage of pterygopalatine ganglion efferents to paranasal sinuses and nasal mucosa in man.
        Cells Tissues Organs. 2003; 175: 223-228
        • Suzuki N.
        • Hardebo J.E.
        The cerebrovascular parasympathetic innervation.
        Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1993; 5: 33-46
        • Goadsby P.J.
        Pathophysiology of cluster headache: a trigeminal autonomic cephalgia.
        Lancet Neurol. 2002; 1: 251-257
        • Goadsby P.J.
        • Lipton R.B.
        • Ferrari M.D.
        Migraine—current understanding and treatment.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 257-270
        • Burstein R.
        • Jakubowski M.
        Unitary hypothesis for multiple triggers of the pain and strain of migraine.
        J Comp Neurol. 2005; 493: 9-14
        • May A.
        • Goadsby P.J.
        The trigeminovascular system in humans: pathophysiologic implications for primary headache syndromes of the neural influences on the cerebral circulation.
        J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999; 19: 115-127
        • Goadsby P.J.
        • Charbit A.R.
        • Andreou A.P.
        • Akerman S.
        • Holland P.R.
        Neurobiology of migraine.
        Neuroscience. 2009; 161: 327-341
        • Sluder G.
        The role of the sphenopalatine (or Meckle's) ganglion in nasal headaches.
        New York Medical Journal. 1908; : 989-990
        • Devoghel J.C.
        Cluster headache and sphenopalatine block.
        Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1981; 32: 101-107
        • Kudrow L.
        • Kudrow D.B.
        • Sandweiss J.H.
        Rapid and sustained relief of migraine attacks with intranasal lidocaine: preliminary findings.
        Headache. 1995; 35: 79-82
        • Maizels M.
        • Scott B.
        • Cohen W.
        • Chen W.
        Intranasal lidocaine for treatment of migraine: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
        JAMA. 1996; 276: 319-321
        • Narouze S.
        • Kapural L.
        • Casanova J.
        • Mekhail N.
        Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache.
        Headache. 2009; 49: 571-577
        • Tepper S.J.
        • Rezai A.
        • Narouze S.
        • Steiner C.
        • Mohajer P.
        • Ansarinia M.
        Acute treatment of intractable migraine with sphenopalatine ganglion electrical stimulation.
        Headache. 2009; 49: 983-989
        • Ansarinia M.
        • Rezai A.
        • Tepper S.J.
        • Steiner C.P.
        • Stump J.
        • Stanton-Hicks M.
        • et al.
        Electrical stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion for acute treatment of cluster headaches.
        Headache. 2010; 50: 1164-1174
        • Schoenen J.
        • Jensen R.H.
        • Lanteri-Minet M.
        • Lainez M.J.
        • Gaul C.
        • Goodman A.M.
        • et al.
        Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: a randomized, sham-controlled study.
        Cephalalgia. 2013; 33: 816-830
        • Jurgens T.P.
        • Schoenen J.
        • Rostgaard J.
        • Hillerup S.
        • Lainez M.J.
        • Assaf A.T.
        • et al.
        Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion in intractable cluster headache: expert consensus on patient selection and standards of care.
        Cephalalgia. 2014; 34: 1100-1110
        • Lang J.
        • Keller H.
        The posterior opening of the pterygopalatine fossa and the position of the pterygopalatine ganglion.
        Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb. 1978; 124: 207-214
        • Assaf A.T.
        • Klatt J.C.
        • Blessmann M.
        • Kohlmeier C.
        • Friedrich R.E.
        • Pohlenz P.
        • et al.
        Value of intra- and post-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for positioning control of a sphenopalatine ganglion neurostimulator in patients with chronic cluster headache.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 408-413
        • Hillerup S.
        • Rostgaard J.
        • Assaf A.
        • Jurgens T.
        • Barlose M.
        • Lainez M.
        • et al.
        EHMTI-0398. Long term safety of the ATI neurostimulation system for the treatment of cluster headache.
        J Headache Pain. 2014; 15: I4
        • Tung T.C.
        • Chen Y.R.
        • Bendor-Samuel R.
        Surgical complications of the Le Fort I osteotomy—a retrospective review of 146 cases.
        Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1995; 18: 102-107
        • Al-Din O.F.
        • Coghlan K.M.
        • Magennis P.
        Sensory nerve disturbance following Le Fort I osteotomy.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 25: 13-19
        • Karas N.D.
        • Boyd S.B.
        • Sinn D.P.
        Recovery of neurosensory function following orthognathic surgery.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990; 48: 124-134
        • Maurer P.
        • Otto C.
        • Eckert A.W.
        • Schubert J.
        Complications in surgical treatment of malocclusions. Report of 50 years experience.
        Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2001; 5: 357-361
        • Snyderman C.H.
        • Goldman S.A.
        • Carrau R.L.
        • Ferguson B.J.
        • Grandis J.R.
        Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation is an effective method of treatment for posterior epistaxis.
        Am J Rhinol. 1999; 13: 137-140
        • McDonald T.J.
        • Pearson B.W.
        Follow-up on maxillary artery ligation for epistaxis.
        Arch Otolaryngol. 1980; 106: 635-638