Advertisement

Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review

Published:November 20, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023

      Abstract

      The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the survival and success rates of osseointegrated implants determined in longitudinal studies that conducted a follow-up of at least 10 years. A broad electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant publications in indexed journals, evaluating the clinical performance of dental implants. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers analyzed titles, abstracts, and complete articles, prioritizing studies of the randomized clinical trial type. A total of 23 articles were included in this review. Ten prospective studies, nine retrospective studies, and four randomized clinical trials, which evaluated 7711 implants, were selected. The mean follow-up time of the studies included was 13.4 years. All of the studies reported survival rates and mean marginal bone resorption values, with cumulative mean values of 94.6% and 1.3 mm, respectively. Fourteen studies related success rates. Taking into consideration the disparate outcome measures employed to assess dental implant performance and within the limitations of this systematic review, we may affirm that osseointegrated implants are safe and present high survival rates and minimal marginal bone resorption in the long term.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Adell R.
        • Lekholm U.
        • Rockler B.
        • Brånemark P.I.
        A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw.
        Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10: 387-416
        • Adell R.
        Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50: 251-254
        • Pikner S.S.
        • Gröndahl K.
        • Jemt T.
        • Friberg B.
        Marginal bone loss at implants: a retrospective long-term follow-up of turned Brånemark system implants.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009; 11: 11-23
        • Smith D.E.
        • Zarb G.
        Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62: 567-572
        • ten Bruggenkate C.M.
        • van der Kwast W.A.
        • Oosterbeek H.S.
        Success criteria in oral implantology: a review of the literature.
        Int J Oral Implantol. 1990; 7: 45-53
        • Simonis P.
        • Dufour T.
        • Tenenbaum H.
        Long-term implant survival and success: a 10–16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 772-777
        • Misch C.E.
        • Perel M.L.
        • Wang H.L.
        • Sammartino G.
        • Galindo-Moreno P.
        • Trisi P.
        • et al.
        Implant success, survival and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa consensus conference.
        Implant Dent. 2008; 17: 5-15
        • Berglundh T.
        • Persson L.
        • Klinge B.
        A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29: 197-212
        • Schnitman P.A.
        • Shulman L.B.
        Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1979; 98: 373-377
        • Albrektsson T.
        • Zarb G.A.
        • Worthington P.
        • Erikson A.R.
        The long-term efficacy of current used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1: 11-25
        • Albrektsson T.
        • Isidor F.
        Consensus report of Session IV.
        in: Lang N.P. Karring T. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. Quintessence, London1993: 365-369
        • Roos J.
        • Sennerby L.
        • Lekholm U.
        • Jemt T.
        • Gröndahl K.
        • Albrektsson T.
        A quantitative and qualitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective study of the Brånemark Implant.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12: 504-514
        • Zarb G.A.
        • Albrektsson T.
        Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 641
        • Karoussis I.K.
        • Salvi G.E.
        • Heitz-Mayfield L.J.
        • Brägger U.
        • Hämmerle C.H.
        • Lang N.P.
        Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14: 329-339
        • Needleman I.
        • Chin S.
        • O’Brien T.
        • Petrie A.
        • Donos N.
        Systematic review of outcome measurements and reference group(s) to evaluate and compare implant success and failure.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 122-132
        • Stevens K.R.
        Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice.
        AACN Clin Issue. 2001; 12: 529-538
        • Liberati A.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Mulrow C.
        • Gøtzsche P.C.
        • Ioannidis J.P.
        • et al.
        The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6: 1-6
        • Schardt C.
        • Adams M.B.
        • Owens T.
        • Keitz S.
        • Fontelo P.
        Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions.
        BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007; 15: 7-16
        • Nguyen Q.V.
        • Bezemer P.D.
        • Habets L.
        • Prahl-Andersen B.
        A systematic review of the relationship between overjet size and traumatic dental injuries.
        Eur J Orthod. 1999; 21: 503-515
        • Needleman I.G.
        A guide to systematic reviews.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29: 6-9
        • Higgins J.P.
        • Thompson S.G.
        • Deeks J.J.
        • Altman D.G.
        Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560
        • Turpin D.L.
        CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128: 681-685
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Moher D.
        CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 1063-1070
        • Åstrand P.
        • Ahlqvist J.
        • Gunne J.
        • Nilson H.
        Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20-year follow-up.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10: 207-217
        • Deporter D.A.
        • Kermalli J.
        • Todescan R.
        • Atenafu E.G.
        Performance of sintered, porous-surface, press-fit implants after 10 years of function in the partially edentulous posterior mandible.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012; 32: 563-570
        • Deporter D.A.
        • Pharoah M.
        • Yeh S.
        • Todescan R.
        • Atenafu E.G.
        Performance of titanium alloy sintered porous-surface (SPS) implants supporting mandibular overdentures during a 20-year prospective study.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 189-195
        • Carlsson G.E.
        • Lindquist L.W.
        • Jemt T.
        Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13: 295-302
        • Degidi M.
        • Nardi D.
        • Piattelli A.
        10-year follow up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14: 828-838
        • Gotfredsen K.A.
        10-year prospective study of single tooth implants placed in the anterior maxilla.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14: 80-87
        • Jacobs R.
        • Pittayapat P.
        • van Steenberghe D.
        • De Mars G.
        • Gijbels F.
        • Van Der Donck A.
        • et al.
        A split-mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw-shaped titanium implant systems.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2010; 37: 1119-1127
        • Jemt T.
        • Johansson J.
        Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006; 8: 61-69
        • Jemt T.
        Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2008; 21: 400-408
        • Ji T.J.
        • Kan J.Y.
        • Rungcharassaeng K.
        • Roe P.
        • Lozada J.L.
        Immediate loading of maxillary and mandibular implant supported fixed complete dentures: a 1- to 10-year retrospective study.
        J Oral Implantol. 2012; 38: 469-476
        • Karoussis I.K.
        • Brägger U.
        • Salvi G.E.
        • Bürgin W.
        • Lang N.P.
        Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 8-17
        • Kim D.M.
        • Badovinac R.L.
        • Lorenz R.L.
        • Fiorellini J.P.
        • Weber H.P.
        A 10-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of one-stage dental implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 19: 254-258
        • Lekholm U.
        • Gunne J.
        • Henry P.
        • Higuchi K.
        • Lindén U.
        • Bergström C.
        • et al.
        Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 639-645
        • Leonhardt A.
        • Gröndahl K.
        • Bergström C.
        • Lekholm U.
        Long-term follow-up of osseointegrated titanium implants using clinical, radiographic and microbiological parameters.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13: 127-132
        • Lops D.
        • Bressan E.
        • Pisoni G.
        • Cea N.
        • Corazza B.
        • Romeo E.
        Short implants in partially edentulous maxillae and mandibles: a 10 to 20 years retrospective evaluation.
        Int J Dent. 2012; 35: 1-8
        • Mangano F.G.
        • Shibli J.A.
        • Sammons R.L.
        • Iaculli F.
        • Piatelli A.
        • Mangano C.
        Short (8-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a prospective clinical study with 1- to 10-years of follow-up.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 933-940
        • Mertens C.
        • Meyer-Bäumer A.
        • Kappel H.
        • Hoffmann J.
        • Steveling H.G.
        Use of 8-mm and 9-mm implants in atrophic alveolar ridges: 10-year results.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 1501-1508
        • Misje K.
        • Bjørnland T.
        • Saxegaard E.
        • Jensen J.L.
        Treatment outcome of dental implants in the esthetic zone: a 12- to 15-year retrospective study.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26: 365-369
        • Östman P.O.
        • Hellman M.
        • Sennerby L.
        Ten years later. Results from a prospective single-centre clinical study on 121 oxidized (TiUniteTM) Brånemark implants in 46 patients.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14: 852-860
        • Ravald N.
        • Dahlgren S.
        • Teiwik A.
        • Gröndahl K.
        Long-term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full-arch bridges. Results after 12–15 years.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 1144-1151
        • Rocci A.
        • Rocci M.
        • Scoccia A.
        • Martignoni M.
        • Gottlow J.
        • Sennerby L.
        Immediate loading of maxillary prostheses using flapless surgery, implant placement in predetermined positions, and prefabricated provisional restorations. Part 2: A retrospective 10-year clinical study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 1199-1204
        • Romeo E.
        • Ghisolfi M.
        • Rozza R.
        • Chiapasco M.
        • Lops D.
        Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19: 586-592
        • Ma S.
        • Tawse-Smith A.
        • Thomson W.M.
        • Payne A.G.
        Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems: 10-year outcomes.
        Int J Prosthodontic. 2010; 23: 321-332
        • Telleman G.
        • Meijer H.J.
        • Raghoebar G.M.
        Long-term evaluation of hollow screw cylinder dental implants: clinical and radiographic results after 10 years.
        J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 203-210
        • van Steenberghe D.
        • Quirynen M.
        • Naert I.
        • Maffei G.
        • Jacobs R.
        Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2001; 28: 628-633
        • Brånemark P.I.
        • Adell R.
        • Breine U.
        • Hansson B.O.
        • Lindström J.
        • Ohlsson A.
        Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969; 3: 81-100
        • Esposito M.
        • Grusovin M.G.
        • Coulthard P.
        • Thomsen P.
        • Worthington H.V.
        A 5-year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implants systems. A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 557-568
        • Pandis N.
        The evidence pyramid and introduction to randomized controlled trials.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140: 446-447
        • Pjetursson B.E.
        • Tan K.
        • Lang N.P.
        • Brägger U.
        • Egger M.
        • Zwahlen M.
        A systematic review of the survival and complications rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 625-642
        • Jung R.E.
        • Pjetursson B.E.
        • Glauser R.
        • Zembic A.
        • Zwahlen M.
        • Lang N.P.
        A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 119-130
        • Davarpanah M.
        • Martinez H.
        • Etienne D.
        • Zabalegui I.
        • Mattout P.
        • Chiche F.
        • et al.
        A prospective multicenter evaluation of 1583 3i implants: 1- to 5-year data.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 820-828
        • Sun H.L.
        • Huang C.
        • Wu Y.R.
        • Shi B.
        Failure rates of short (≤10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26: 816-825
        • Wallace R.H.
        The relationship between cigarette smoking and dental implant failure.
        Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2000; 8: 103-106
        • Deluca S.
        • Habsha E.
        • Zarb G.A.
        The effect of smoking on osseointegrated dental implants. Part I: Implant survival.
        Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19: 491-498
        • Klokkevold P.R.
        • Han T.J.
        How do smoking, diabetes, and periodontitis affect outcomes of implant treatment.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22: 173-202
        • Javed F.
        • Romanos G.E.
        Impact of diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the osseointegration of dental implants: a systematic literature review.
        J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 1719-1730
        • Oates T.W.
        • Huynh-Ba G.
        • Vargas A.
        • Alexander P.
        • Feine J.
        A critical review of diabetes, glycemic control, and dental implant therapy.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 117-127
        • Misch C.E.
        • Dietsh-Misch F.
        • Hoar J.E.
        • Beck G.
        • Hazen R.
        • Misch C.M.
        A bone quality-based implant system: first year of prosthetic loading.
        J Oral Implantol. 1999; 25: 185-197
        • Lioubavina-Hack N.
        • Lang N.P.
        • Karring T.
        Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17: 244-250
        • Alsaadi G.
        • Quirynen M.
        • Michiels K.
        • Jacobs R.
        • Van Steenberghe D.
        A biomechanical assessment of the relation between the oral implant stability at insertion and subjective bone quality assessment.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34: 359-366
        • Jang H.W.
        • Kang J.K.
        • Lee K.
        • Lee Y.S.
        • Park P.K.
        A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants.
        J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3: 204-215
        • Roos-Jansåker A.M.
        • Lindahl C.
        • Renvert H.
        • Renvert S.
        Nine-to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: Presence of peri-implant lesions.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2006; 33: 290-295
        • Zitzmann N.U.
        • Berglundh T.
        Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 286-291
        • Lang N.P.
        • Berglundh T.
        Periimplant diseases: where are we now? Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38: 178-181
        • Buser D.
        • Janner S.F.
        • Wittneben J.G.
        • Brägger U.
        • Ramseier C.A.
        • Salvi G.E.
        10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients.
        Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14: 839-851
        • Papaspyridakos P.
        • Chen C.J.
        • Singh M.
        • Weber H.P.
        • Gallucci G.O.
        Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review.
        J Dent Res. 2012; 91: 242-248