International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 10 , Pages 956-961, October 2010

Cleft size at the time of palate repair in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate as an indicator of maxillary growth

  • Y.-F. Liao

      Affiliations

    • Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Craniofacial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress: Y.-F. Liao, Department of Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 199 Tung-Hwa North Road, Taipei 105, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 2 27135211x3533.
  • ,
  • N.K.K. Prasad

      Affiliations

    • Dental College, SRI Ramachandra University, Chennai, India
  • ,
  • Y.-T. Chiu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Craniofacial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • ,
  • C. Yun

      Affiliations

    • Craniofacial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • ,
  • P.K.-T. Chen

      Affiliations

    • Craniofacial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
    • Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Accepted 22 January 2010. published online 16 July 2010.

Abstract 

Cleft size at the time of palate repair might affect the difficulty of surgical repair and, thus, indirectly postoperative maxillary growth. This retrospective study aimed to determine whether a correlation existed between the cleft size at the time of palate repair and the growth of the maxilla. Maxillary dental casts of 39 infants with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, taken at the time of palate repair, were used to measure cleft size. Cleft size was defined as the percentage of the total palatal area. The later growth of the maxilla was determined using lateral and postero-anterior cephalometric radiographs taken at 9 years of age. The Pearson correlation analysis was used for statistical analysis. The results showed negative correlations between cleft size and the maxillary length (PMP–ANS, PMP–A) and the maxillary protrusion (S–N–ANS, SNA). These data suggest that in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate there is a significant correlation between the cleft size at the time of palate repair and the maxillary length and protrusion. Patients with a large cleft at the time of palate repair have a shorter and more retrusive maxilla than those with a small cleft by the age of 9 years.

Keywords: cleft size, maxillary growth, palate repair, treatment outcome, unilateral cleft lip and palate

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0901-5027(10)00291-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.01.024

International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 10 , Pages 956-961, October 2010