International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 7 , Pages 690-698 , July 2010

Effect of bone to implant contact percentage on bone remodelling surrounding a dental implant

  • Z. Lian

      Affiliations

    • State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dept. of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress: Zhiqiang Lian, State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dept. of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China. Tel.: +86 (0)411 84708408; fax: +86 (0)411 84708769.
    • ,
  • H. Guan

      Affiliations

    • Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland 4222, Australia
    • ,
  • S. Ivanovski

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland 4222, Australia
    • ,
  • Y-C. Loo

      Affiliations

    • Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland 4222, Australia
    • ,
  • N.W. Johnson

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland 4222, Australia
    • ,
  • H. Zhang

      Affiliations

    • State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dept. of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China

,Accepted 18 March 2010.

References 

  1. Block MS, Finger IM, Fontenot MG, Kent JN. Loaded hydroxylapatite-coated and grit-blasted titanium implants in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:219–225
  2. Carter DR. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984;36:S19–S24
  3. Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:954–962
  4. Chou HY, Jagodnik JJ, Muftu S. Predictions of bone remodelling around dental implant systems. J Biomech. 2008;41:1365–1373
  5. Cowin SC, Firoozbakhsh K. Bone remodelling of diaphyseal surfaces under constant load: theoretical predictions. J Biomech. 1981;14:471–484
  6. Cowin SC, Hart RT, Baber JR, Kohn DH. Functional adaptation in long bones: establishing in vivo values for surface remodelling rate coefficients. J Biomech. 1985;18:665–684
  7. Cowin SC, Hegedus D. Bone remodelling. I. Theory of adaptive elasticity. J Elasticity. 1976;6:313–326
  8. Cowin SC, Nachlinger RR. Bone remodelling. III. Uniqueness and stability in adaptive elasticity theory. J Elasticity. 1978;8:285–295
  9. Currey JD. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech. 1988;21:131–139
  10. Degide M, Petrone G, Lezzi G, Piattelli A. Histologic evaluation of 2 human immediately loaded and 1 titanium implants inserted in the posterior mandible and submerged retrieved after 6 months. J Oral Implantol. 2003;29:223–229
  11. Firoozbakhsh K, Cowin SC. An analytical model of Pauwels’ functional adaptation mechanism in bone. J Biomech Eng. 1981;103:246–252
  12. Frost HM. The Laws of Bone Structure. Springfield: Thomas C C; 1964;
  13. Grupi V, Guglielmino E, La Rosa G, Vander Sloten J, Van Oosterwyck H. Numerical analysis of bone adaptation around an oral implant due to overload stress. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2004;218:407–415
  14. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic design analysis. J Biomech. 1987;20:1135–1150
  15. Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:124–134
  16. Jacobs CR, Simo JC, Bearpre GS, Carter DR. Adaptive bone remodeling incorporating simultaneous density and anisotropy considerations. J Biomech. 1997;30:603–613
  17. Li JY, Li HY, Shi L, Foa AS, Ucer C, Devlin H, et al. A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1073–1078
  18. Lian ZQ, Guan H, Ivanovski S, Loo YC, Johnson NW, Zhang HW. Finite element simulation of bone remodelling in the human mandible surrounding dental implant. Acta Mechanica; Submitted.
  19. Lu J, Pan KF, Xu XL, Qu HT. Influence of different bone contact ratio to stress distribution in bone around dental implant. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;15:234–237[in Chinese]
  20. Mellal A, Wiskott HWA, Scherrer SS, Belser UC. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:239–248
  21. Menicucci G, Mossolov A, Mozzati M, Lorenzetti M, Preti G. Tooth–implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:334–341
  22. Mullender MG, Huiskes R. Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff's law. J Orthop Res. 1995;13:503–512
  23. Mullender MG, Huiskes R, Weinans H. A physiological approach to simulation of bone remodelling as a self-organizational control process. J Biomech. 1994;27:1389–1394
  24. Neoss Limited . Neoss Implant System Surgical Guidelines, UK. 2006;
  25. Neukam FW, Flemmig TF Working Group 3. Local and systemic conditions potentially compromising osseointegration. Consensus report of Working Group 3. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:160–162
  26. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. 3D-FEA of bone–implant contact percentages and patterns on implant–bone interfacial stresses. J Dent. 1997;25:485–491
  27. Pauwels F. Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus. Berlin: Springer; 1965;
  28. Peng L, Bai J, Zeng X, Zhou Y. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Med Eng Phys. 2006;28:227–233
  29. Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech. 1988;21:155–168
  30. Roberts WE. Bone tissue interface. J Dent Educ. 1988;52:804–809
  31. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int. 1985;37:411–417
  32. Ruimerman R, Huiskes R. Development of a unifying theory for mechanical adaptation and maintenance of trabecular bone. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2005;6:225–238
  33. Simmons CA, Meguid SA, Pilliar RM. Mechanical regulation of localized and appositional bone formation around bone-interfacing implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:63–71
  34. Testori T, Szmukler-Moncler S, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M, Trisi P, Weinstein RL. Healing of Osseotite implants under submerged and immediate loading conditions in a single patient: a case report and interface analysis after 2 months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22:345–353
  35. van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2006;9:257–270
  36. Watzak G, Zechner W, Ulm C, Tangl S, Tepper G, Watzek G. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:408–416
  37. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech. 1992;25:1425–1441
  38. Wolff JL. The law of bone remodelling, [Maquet P, Furlong R, Trans.] Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1892;[in 1986]
  39. Xing XJ, Liu BL, Liu L. The influence of osseointegration percentage on implant–bone interfacial stresses. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ (Med Sci). 2002;23:395–397[in Chinese]
  40. Zhu XH, Gong H, Zhu D, Gao BZ. A study of the effect of non-linearities in the equation of bone remodelling. J Biomech. 2002;35:951–960

PII: S0901-5027(10)00114-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.020

International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 7 , Pages 690-698 , July 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution