« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 7
, Pages
699-704
, July 2010
Comparison of vacuum and conventional wound dressings for full thickness skin grafts in the minipig model
-
SO2-levels by group and day. Note the low levels of the vacuum group for the first 3 days after transplantation and similar values starting from day 4 (relative units).
SO2-levels by group and day. Note the low levels of the vacuum group for the first 3 days after transplantation and similar values starting from day 4 (relative units).
-
Haemoglobin levels over time by dressing group. The values were slightly higher in the vacuum dressing group over the whole observation period (relative units).
Haemoglobin levels over time by dressing group. The values were slightly higher in the vacuum dressing group over the whole observation period (relative units).
-
Velocity values over time for the groups. The deepest levels in the vacuum group could be observed on days 2–3, in the classic dressing group on days 3 and 4 (relative units).
Velocity values over time for the groups. The deepest levels in the vacuum group could be observed on days 2–3, in the classic dressing group on days 3 and 4 (relative units).
-
Transplants on the first day with an intact epidermal and dermal layer (×5) (a) HE; (b) CD31. (c) On day 3 (×10) the cutaneous–subcutaneous transition zone showed vital tissue with infiltration of lym
Transplants on the first day with an intact epidermal and dermal layer (×5) (a) HE; (b) CD31. (c) On day 3 (×10) the cutaneous–subcutaneous transition zone showed vital tissue with infiltration of lymphocytes and granulocytes, reflecting acute inflammation. (d) In the CD31 staining single capillaries are already detectable in the graft. On day 5 (×10) (e) HE an increasing neoformation of vessels can be seen, along with the neoformation of fibrocytes (f) CD31. In both groups, on day 7 (×10) numerous capillaries are embedded in the regenerated cutaneous–subcutaneous tissue (g) HE; (h) CD31.
PII: S0901-5027(10)00110-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.016
© 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 7
, Pages
699-704
, July 2010
