International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 6 , Pages 580-584 , June 2010

Efficacy of nimesulide versus meloxicam in the control of pain, swelling and trismus following extraction of impacted lower third molar

  • S.A.F. De Menezes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Periodontics, University Center of Pará, Avenida Nazaré 630, CEP: 66035170 (Nazaré), Belém, Pará, Brazil
  • ,
  • P.R. Cury

      Affiliations

    • Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Bahia, Av. Araújo Pinho, 62. Canela, CEP 40110-150, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress: Patricia Ramos Cury, Av. Araújo Pinho, 62, Canela CEP: 40110-150, Salvador/Bahia. Tel.: +55 71 3336 8993; fax: +55 71 3336 5776.

,Accepted 16 March 2010.

  • Image Result

    Distances used for the evaluation of postoperative swelling: from the angle of the mandible to tragus (Distance I); from the angle of the mandible to the external corner of the eye (Distance II); from

    Distances used for the evaluation of postoperative swelling: from the angle of the mandible to tragus (Distance I); from the angle of the mandible to the external corner of the eye (Distance II); from the angle of the mandible to the nasal border (Distance III); from the angle of the mandible to the labial commissure (Distance IV); and from the angle of the mandible to the soft pogonion (Distance V).

  • Image Result
    Verbal rating scale (VRS) in the meloxicam (MEL) and nimesulide (NIM) groups.

    Verbal rating scale (VRS) in the meloxicam (MEL) and nimesulide (NIM) groups.

  • Image Result
    Percentage of reduction in mouth opening 24, 48 and 72h postoperatively for the nimesulide and meloxicam groups.

    Percentage of reduction in mouth opening 24, 48 and 72h postoperatively for the nimesulide and meloxicam groups.

PII: S0901-5027(10)00106-2

doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.012

International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 6 , Pages 580-584 , June 2010