International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 5 , Pages 440-445, May 2010

Intra-articular injection of tenoxicam following temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a pilot study

  • I. Aktas

      Affiliations

    • Istanbul University, School of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 34093 Capa, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress: Irem Aktas, Dr. Kemal Akgüder Cd. Yeniyol Sk. Melek Apt. 15/14, 81110 Bostanci, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel.: +90 532 564 47 93; fax: +90 216 363 55 39.
  • ,
  • S. Yalcin

      Affiliations

    • Istanbul University, School of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 34093 Capa, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • S. Sencer

      Affiliations

    • Istanbul University, School of Medicine, Department of Neuroradiology, 34093 Capa, Istanbul, Turkey

Accepted 5 February 2010. published online 08 March 2010.

Abstract 

This study examined the clinical and radiological effects of intra-articular tenoxicam injection following arthrocentesis and compared them with arthrocentesis alone in patients with disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR). 24 temporomandibular joints (TMJs) in 21 patients with DDwoR were studied. Patients were divided randomly into Group A in which only arthrocentesis was performed (14 TMJs in 14 patients) and Group AT which received arthrocentesis plus intra-articular injection of tenoxicam (10 TMJs in 7 patients). Patients were evaluated before the procedure, on postoperative day 7, then 2, 3, 4 weeks, and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 months postoperatively. Intensity of joint pain was assessed using a visual analog scale. Maximum mouth opening was recorded at each follow-up. TMJ sounds and palpation scores were noted as positive or negative. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed before and 6 months after treatment in both groups. Disc form, disc location during neutral position, reduction with movement, joint effusion, structures of the articular surfaces, and bone marrow anomalies were evaluated all in MRIs. Both treatments succesfully increased maximum mouth opening and reduced TMJ pain; there were no complications. Difference between the groups was not statistically significant and a larger controlled study is necessary to clarify this use of tenoxicam.

Key words: tenoxicam, TMJ, arthrocentesis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0901-5027(10)00053-6

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.02.010

International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 5 , Pages 440-445, May 2010