International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 4 , Pages 327-332, April 2010

Long-term stability of adolescent versus adult surgery for treatment of mandibular deficiency

  • W.R. Proffit

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress: W. R. Proffit, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, CB# 7450, 201 Brauer Hall, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA. Tel: +1 919 966 4428; fax: +1 919 843 8864.
  • ,
  • C. Phillips

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
  • ,
  • T.A. Turvey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Accepted 20 January 2010. published online 24 February 2010.

Abstract 

In mandibular deficient patients, mandibular growth is not expected after the adolescent growth spurt, so mandibular advancement surgery is often carried out at 13 years. To test if the long-term stability for younger patients is similar to that for adult patients, the authors compared cephalometric changes from 1-year postsurgery (when changes due to the surgery should be completed) to 5-year follow up. 32 patients who had early mandibular advancement with or without simultaneous maxillary surgery (aged up to 16 for girls and 18 for boys), and 52 patients with similar surgery at older ages were studied. Beyond 1-year postsurgery, the younger patients showed significantly greater change in the horizontal and vertical position of points B and pogonion, the horizontal (but not vertical) position of gonion, and mandibular plane angle. 50% of younger patients had 2–4mm backward movement of Pg and another 25% had >4mm. 15% of older patients had 2–4mm change and none had >4mm. Long-term changes in younger patients who had two-jaw surgery were greater than for mandibular advancement only. Changes in younger groups were greater than for adult groups. Satisfaction with treatment and perception of problems were similar for both groups.

Key words: stability, adolescent, adult, surgery, mandibular deficiency

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0901-5027(10)00015-9

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.01.012

International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 39, Issue 4 , Pages 327-332, April 2010